South Africa’s National Gambling Bill Faces Provincial Pushback

The bill, first introduced in 2018 to amend the National Gambling Act of 2004, has already lapsed twice due to procedural delays and unresolved disagreements. Its latest iteration has once again triggered resistance from several provinces, with the Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board (WCGRB) emerging as the most vocal critic. The WCGRB lodged “strong objections,” warning that several key clauses “encroach on provincial competencies, create duplication, and threaten provincial revenue.”
A central point of contention is the proposal to introduce a single National Central Electronic Monitoring System (NCEMS) to oversee gambling activity across all provinces. The provincial authorities have warned that such a system would duplicate existing, provincially approved monitoring infrastructure already in use within the province. According to provincial officials, the move would impose unnecessary costs on licensed operators while weakening, rather than strengthening, local oversight.
Further objections have been raised over the bill’s plan to expand the powers of a national gambling inspectorate, including the ability to investigate illegal gambling operations without provincial involvement. The Western Cape has argued that this approach risks overlapping mandates, regulatory confusion and diminished accountability, particularly in provinces that have invested heavily in enforcement and compliance mechanisms.
Financial concerns also feature prominently. Under the current framework, provinces retain certain gambling-related revenues, including proceeds from confiscated unlawful winnings, which are used to fund regulatory activities and public programmes. The bill proposes redirecting these funds to a national body, which critics warn would erode essential revenue streams and weaken provincial regulatory capacity.
The legislative process itself has compounded uncertainty. After being passed by the National Assembly, the bill was rejected by the National Council of Provinces (NCOP), triggering a mediation process that has progressed slowly. With substantive amendments introduced over time, questions have also been raised about whether renewed public consultation may be legally required before the bill can advance further.
The standoff comes at a time of unprecedented growth in South Africa’s gambling market, particularly in online and sports betting. Total industry turnover has climbed to an estimated R1.5 trillion, with gross gambling revenue reaching a record R75 billion in the latest financial year. Online betting remains the primary growth engine, posting year-on-year gains of around 60% and now accounting for the majority of industry revenue and tax contributions.
Provinces such as the Western Cape, Gauteng and Mpumalanga have emerged as key beneficiaries, with gambling taxes and levies collectively generating close to R6 billion. Against this backdrop, lawmakers are sounding the alarm over the rapid expansion of illegal and offshore operators, which are increasingly blamed for regulatory blind spots and rising social harm. While both national and provincial authorities agree that stronger oversight is urgently needed, they remain divided on whether a more centralised regulatory model is the right response, or whether existing provincial frameworks should be strengthened instead.





